Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Three Cheers For Our 'World Class' Justice System!

Tenant drags case for 40 years; draws Madras HC's ire
~The property’s original owner was C S Masilamani, and he filed the suit in the year 1975 seeking eviction of Govindasamy Naidu.

It's on days like this that I gaze in wonder at this huge edifice called the Indian Justice System. Truly, this is 'world class'. Can anywhere in the world a tenant delay, obstruct and obfuscate matters for 40 years with the sole aim of not vacating the house and return to owner?

What were the judges doing? Why didn't they realize until now that this criminal tenant was fooling them? He is a criminal, that's what he is. Were the previous judges in cohorts with the tenant?

Can the 'hon'ble' Madras High Court fix accountability for this gross violation of the house owners right to have ownership of his property? Find the guilty within the legal system who aided and abetted this fraud? Else how will people have faith in the Judiciary?

I would urge the big coats in HC & SC to look closely at their house and fix this mess which exists all over the country. Instead of zipping around the country (and abroad) giving feel-good speeches!




Brexit: Will Britain Leave EU?

Well, it's difficult to predict. Big business and industry along with the business and political elites seem to be strong supporters of the 'Remain in EU' vote while small businesses and lay people seem to be the bulk of the supporters of the 'Leave EU' bloc. And, a lot of the multi-national companies (read Japanese, Korean, American etc) which operate in Britain support the Remain vote. They save a lot on taxes this way.

It seems to be 50-50 right now. There does exist a 'strong' popular wish to leave EU and all that it has come to represent. This has become a fight between the 'little people', as one writer put it, and the 'establishment'. Remains to be seen who actually will prevail on June 23rd, the day of the referendum.

Brexit Referendum

Why did it come to this? Why is 'popular' sentiment against EU? There are broadly three reasons:

1. Brash and arrogant EU bureaucracy based in Brussels whose policies don't help small businesses in Britain. Remember, Britain is a nation of small businesses. EU is seen as not being a friend of small businesses For ex.: British cider makers face being crippled by Brussels bureaucrats

2. Poor countries such as Greece are constantly living beyond their means expecting their richer EU counterparts to bail them out, repeatedly. For ex.: The UK pays more into the EU budget than it gets back.
In 2015, Britain paid £13 billion to the EU budget.

3. The borderless EU has allowed economic migrants from poorer countries such as Greece and Portugal and some of the newer East European member countries to migrate to well off Britain, Germany etc for jobs. This is leading to resentment. In fact, curbing migration from Eastern European EU countries is a key goal for many Britons who plan to vote to leave the EU in the referendum!


Here is a sampling of the popular sentiment as expressed on the internet regarding Brexit (the Leave campaign seems to have more support, atleast online):

But first, let's see what the protagonists on both sides are saying.

LEAVE: Is the Brexit a Modern-Day 'Peasants Revolt'? By John Longworth, Chairman, Vote Leave Business Council
Corporate, business leaders are economically rational. They are driven by quarterly reporting, twice yearly dividends, generous end of year Executive bonuses and by the avoidance of paying tax. In other words, they are narrowly focussed and short-term in their thinking. By the same token, politicians in power rarely think beyond the next election. Anything corporates or those in power say should be viewed in this light.

The short-term horizon of the multi-national does not fit comfortably into the EU debate, which is very much about the considerable economic advantages to be had from leaving in the medium- to long-term. These benefits will manifest themselves as we profit from the lifting of the dead hand of bureaucracy from our domestic economy, from the EU constraints on business finance, the removal of the impediments to supporting our foundation industries and allow our public procurement to stimulate our economy. As we begin to gain from the ability to make our own trade deals and the many other positive measures that will make for enhanced job security in a Britain out of the EU and for a more prosperous future.

Some multi-nationals prefer an EU in which they can produce cheaply, hiding behind the EU exhaustion of rights legislation, and sell expensively, in a segmented market, while avoiding paying taxes. Many homegrown businesses who pay their taxes are naturally furious at this unfair competition. In fact, a recent report by Civitas pointed out that the those who have benefitted the most from the EU Single Market have been corporations from outside Europe, whereas Britain has benefitted the least.

More worryingly, there are Eurocrats and those in the "EU invested" business and political elite, multi-nationals and those who aspire to be on the boards of multi-nationals, who consider the "little people" to be irrelevant in this referendum debate. That the "little people" can be manipulated, that they can fool enough of the people all of the time. These are the same vested interests who sponsored the latest CBI economic scare story. Naturally, Corporates operate in the narrow world of short-term profit, whereas this vital decision regarding the EU is a medium- to long-term project in the interests of the wider business community and the nation as a whole.

What they forget is that it is the "little people"—and I consider myself amongst them—who do most of the work, pay their taxes, and underpin the consumption economy, suffer unemployment in downturns. It is the individual entrepreneurs who risk their own money and sweat blood to create most of the jobs, have all the good ideas and account for the vast majority of UK GDP. It is this merry band that will vote to leave the EU in June and be free of its shackles.

But if this is a latter day 'peasants revolt', take a lesson from the original. As Wat Tyler, the leader of the peasants, found to his cost, you cannot rely on our leaders, corporate and political, being gentle folk of the fair play kind. The establishment are ruthless in defence of their own interest.


REMAIN: Britain’s political voice depends on our role as a leading and influential member of the EU
By Kenneth Clarke, Conservative MP and co-president of the cross-party pro-European group British Influence

Whether we remain in the European Union will determine Britain’s future role in the world and the comparative success of our economy for our children and grandchildren. That is the setting in which we should consider the many questions wrapped up in this big stark choice. Unfortunately, referendums tend to be dominated by personalities and headlines.

Britain’s political voice depends on our role as a leading and influential member of the EU. If we leave, we are of less value to our allies and of less concern to our enemies. We need the strongest voice we can get in the dangerous modern world.

When EU governments are able to agree on political and economic policies, they will remain a superpower to influence the Americans, the Russians, Indians and Chinese over the coming decades. Britain on its own would resume the decline which continued through most of the 20th century.

We are in a rapidly changing global economy. Our economic base is the European single market, our largest, nearest and easiest partner. If we leave, we would have to negotiate a new trading pact. Like Norway and Switzerland we would get one, but we would have to obey EU rules on trading standards and lose any say in their development.

I leave aside policies on the environment, climate change, international crime and other issues which are pointless if not pursued on an EU scale. These are obscured at the moment by the crisis over migration and by David Cameron’s initiative to seek reforms.

Nigel Farage has persuaded too many people that we have lost control of our borders. Around two million British people live and work in other EU member states and more EU nationals are coming here because our economy is recovering well. We can negotiate a ban on those coming simply to claim benefits. EU workers who move countries are mainly young and skilled. Our economy has benefited from free movement of European labour in every study done and we do not need pointless national barriers against working Britons, Germans or Poles.

Our Border Agency must continue to tackle our long standing problem of illegal immigration, which is largely from India, Pakistan and Africa. The recent surge in migration is dominated by people from wars in which Britain has participated. Many of those who speak English or have relatives here are trying to come to Britain, so we are part of the problem. This huge crisis will only be solved by EU agreement on a fair and organised system to help genuine victims of war and to return people who are economic migrants.

The important EU reforms which we should press for are economic ones to strengthen future prosperity. We must ensure that the City of London is not disadvantaged by our non-membership of the eurozone.

We must complete the European single market, particularly in services, energy and the digital economy. We must have new EU trade agreements with the US, Japan and China. We can only negotiate those from a position of strength – with our European partners.

Pro-Europeans must strive to persuade a confused public to vote on a positive and optimistic case about the future of our nation. Fear of the modern world, nostalgic yearning for pre-World War sovereignty and the eventual break-up of Europe would be a disaster for our grandchildren.


Popular Sentiment

"As a Brit who has lived in the USA for 20 years, I have had the opportunity to work inside and outside of the EU. While both systems have their pros and cons, I still prefer a system where my economic and civil fate is not decided by an unelected band of commissioners and a barely representative European Parliament. 70% of all economic activity is generated by small and medium businesses and the EU has done it's best to make their life a nightmare for decades with petty and sometimes nonsensical regulations and red tape. What political leaders need to understand with the Brexit vote is that the people will speak. They may make the wrong decision, an uninformed decision, the right decision or any decision but the most important point is that it's THEIR decision and the elected leaders of the EU countries will have to respect it and adjust accordingly. There is a worrying lurch towards more radical political candidates like Trump, Sanders and in Europe, towards Nationalist and far-left parties. This is because the current political elites are too cosy, too complacent and too arrogant to notice that the the people are angry, that they are not being heard and that their votes are being taken for granted. When people feel that they are not being heard they turn to populists who play on their fears and prejudices. This is how Adolf Hitler got into power and we all know how that turned out. Listen to the people politicians or it could turn ugly again" ~Mark Elder

"It is interesting to note that the “little people” or the “common man” are those that all too often the “power brokers ” lose sight of.   It is the “elected men” who look to their own self interest that should be focusing on the very people who gave them their trust, faith and right to govern who need to take stock of their words and actions .   The Common man who elected those in the “House of Commons” and European parliament have had pretty short measure, the rhetoric from both camps has in most part bored and exasperated the general public.  Our Prime Minister, Premier, should have stated his case that he believes it would be wrong to exit. Thereafter spending his time and effort ensuring that everything is done to insure a balanced flow of facts; the good and bad of staying, the good and bad of exiting. He should have a little more faith in the people who elected him to office.  It is with a sense of pride that I know the people of Britain will go to the polls and cast their vote with both head and heart fully engaged. All those I have spoken to have talked about their friends, family and those in the wider community and the impact their vote will or may have on them.   We can but hope that Democracy will again have its day" ~Adrian Bennett-Yard

"It has always been my belief that the EU is a political construct, with little base and in and concern for the "real world" The current desperation of politicians, both our own, and those at the top of the tree on the continent seem to bear this out. Thank you for your balanced input, John- very welcome after the vague rhetoric on both sides of what has become a very tawdry debate. Your last point is very interesting - not only have we heard the spiteful threats from our European "friends" if we were to dare to leave, but I read in a paper today that our own MPs might be able to block a Leave vote. So much for public servants serving (the people at least!)" ~Ian Waring Green

"If Remain wins this man will be our ruler: https://youtu.be/XPgiI46FCDU He bitch slapped national leaders... I suspect he has even greater contempt for Cameron.  The EU is a growing utter disaster. Leaving will not be easy as it will only be a case of out of the fire into the frying pan. But it will be a start." ~Charles M Cawley


And, finally, the cartoonists are having a field day on the topic of Brexit!
























Sunday, June 19, 2016

The Hullabaloo Surrounding Raghuram Rajan's Exit

Good rebuttal of the criticism (mostly unjustified) surrounding Raghuram Rajan's potential exit from RBI:

___________________________________________________________________________________
Raghuram Raj ends: Point & counterpoint
By Swaminathan S

Point:  Raghuram Rajan has been treated badly by the government.

Counter point: The way this has been handled is in sharp contrast to the way things happened in the UPA regime and during their proxy, Chandra Sekhar’s reign. For example, S Venkitaramanan was appointed governor by sacking Malhotra without notice. One SEBI Chairman who had gone to attend a function in his official capacity heard on TV that he did not have to report for work the next day as he would not be getting an extension. Another SEBI Chairman who had all but been guaranteed an extension found himself pipped at the post literally. A file went into the PMO with his name on it, a different name was on the file when it came out. So, the UPA has treated people much worse. In sharp contrast, all that the Modi government has done is to inform Raghuram Rajan that he may not be re appointed. The fact that this has played out with 2 months to go speaks highly of the government. As does the fact that neither the PM nor the FM has uttered one word against him even by innuendo.



Vox Populi comments: Would agree. Only point would be about the tone and tenor of Subramaniam Swamy's crusade against Rajan's continuation. His choice of words could have been better.


Point: Rajan had to go because the government wants a yes man. One journalist says that Rajan was no chamcha and therefore he had to go.

Counter point: No governor of RBI can be a Yes man or will be a Yes man. Even when Venkiratamanan wanted to reduce interest rates, it took him most of his tenure to get the leadership within RBI to see his way. The primary role of a  central bank is to fight inflation and no central bank governor will be able to sleep soundly if this objective is not met. Even when people who have served in North Block which houses the Ministry of Finance and moved to RBI as many have done, they have changed their views based on what was expected of them at RBI and not based on what they felt when they may have been at North Block.

Vox Populi comments: All governments will want a yes man and will try their best to appoint one. As have Congress govts in the past. However, with the proposed Monetary Policy Committee, it will be difficult for govts of the day to push their agendas in RBI in future.

Point: Rajan’s departure is bad for the market, it is bad for the economy, it is just bad.

Counter point:  True that. But the reasoning is wrong. The uncertainty caused by Rajan’s departure is what will worry the markets. It is not that markets want Rajan, it is that they don’t like uncertainty. It is the same markets that went through the roof when it was clear that Modi would be PM. It is ludicrous to argue that the market backs Modi but not his ability find a suitable governor for RBI. And above all else, expect RBI to intervene over the next  months to keep things stable. It should be business as usual.

That’s not all. My brother pointed out to me that the announcement of the exit could not have been timed better. Because between Brexit and Rexit, there are no prizes for guessing what is going to engage the attention of foreign investors.

Agree. This is pure Goebbels! RR might be an international star and a favourite of the financial jockeys of the west. However, deliberately spreading canards in the hope that markets actually fall is a vile act. 

Point: The BJP has no bench strength as is evident from their choice of people for important posts.

Counter point: It is not like Rajan came from the ranks of the BJP, he was actually a UPA pick and the Modi government let him stay on the basis of his credentials. Finding good people should not be difficult given the importance of the position. While it is true that the bench strength of the BJP may be poor, they can always fall back on the time tested policy of digging into the pool of retired bureaucrats to pick the next governor. It is also naive to believe that the government of the day will be driven by any factor other than competence when picking the next governor of the RBI. Even they know surely that there is too much at stake.

For a country of this size, certainly there is no dearth of potential RBI governors! 

Point: Raghuram Rajan had to go because the RSS wanted him out. Because Subramaniam Swamy wanted him out. Because. Because. Because.

Counterpoint: I don’t know. And it does not matter.  All that matters is that a man respected globally is leaving. I hope the government can find a way to utilize his services. Possibly by making him the Chairman of the proposed Monetary Policy Committee. But for that to work, the Committee would have to be kept independent of RBI and not subservient to it.

Agree. Subramaniam Swamy is not part of the govt and he has a right to criticize RR (although don't support the language used by him).

I hope the story is not over. Not yet.

Source:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/raghuram-ka-raj-point-counterpoint-swaminathan-s


Thursday, June 16, 2016

Velagapudi Govt Buildings Taking shape - Amaravati (Video)

Construction work is in progress at frenetic pace at Velagapudi, the site identified for the Andhra Pradesh Secretariat.



When the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated, the people of residual Andhra Pradesh were in utter distress over the deficit budget, lack of resources and above all, no capital city in the new state.

However, with eyes welled up with dreams of a glorious future, Andhraites stepped into the new state and the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh Nara Chandrababu Naidu promised them nothing less than a world-class capital city, Amaravati.

Then began the construction of a dream called Amaravati. Officials and companies from several developed nations were called in to build Amaravati on par with some of the best capitals in the world.

Inspired by their own dreams, millions of Andhraites and Teluguites from all parts of the world too chipped in to take part in Amaravati construction in their own small way. A short video which showcases the construction of Amaravati has been doing the rounds on social media.

The video shows how a dream capital is in the making where 6 lakh square feet of office space in over 6 blocks are being built. Over 7,000 employees will be moving in to the capital city by the end of June to participate in the making of an eternal dream called Amaravati.

Source: Gulte.com
When the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated, the people of residual Andhra Pradesh were in utter distress over the deficit budget, lack of resources and above all, no capital city in the new state.

However, with eyes welled up with dreams of a glorious future, Andhraites stepped into the new state and the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh Nara Chandrababu Naidu promised them nothing less than a world-class capital city, Amaravati.

Then began the construction of a dream called Amaravati. Officials and companies from several developed nations were called in to build Amaravati on par with some of the best capitals in the world.

Inspired by their own dreams, millions of Andhraites and Teluguites from all parts of the world too chipped in to take part in Amaravati construction in their own small way. A short video which showcases the construction of Amaravati has been doing the rounds on social media.

The video shows how a dream capital is in the making where 6 lakh square feet of office space in over 6 blocks are being built. Over 7,000 employees will be moving in to the capital city by the end of June to participate in the making of an eternal dream called Amaravati. - See more at: http://www.gulte.com/news/49911/Amaravati-The-Building-Of-A-Dream#sthash.azAgXGmn.dpuf
When the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated, the people of residual Andhra Pradesh were in utter distress over the deficit budget, lack of resources and above all, no capital city in the new state.

However, with eyes welled up with dreams of a glorious future, Andhraites stepped into the new state and the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh Nara Chandrababu Naidu promised them nothing less than a world-class capital city, Amaravati.

Then began the construction of a dream called Amaravati. Officials and companies from several developed nations were called in to build Amaravati on par with some of the best capitals in the world.

Inspired by their own dreams, millions of Andhraites and Teluguites from all parts of the world too chipped in to take part in Amaravati construction in their own small way. A short video which showcases the construction of Amaravati has been doing the rounds on social media.

The video shows how a dream capital is in the making where 6 lakh square feet of office space in over 6 blocks are being built. Over 7,000 employees will be moving in to the capital city by the end of June to participate in the making of an eternal dream called Amaravati. - See more at: http://www.gulte.com/news/49911/Amaravati-The-Building-Of-A-Dream#sthash.azAgXGmn.dpuf

How Panta Sanjeevini (Farm Ponds) Scheme Is A Boon For Rayalaseema Farmers

By all accounts, Panta Sanjeevini Project of Andhra Pradesh govt seems to be a huge success. The project involves creation of farm ponds to tackle the receding groundwater levels via water harvesting, besides offering water to farming community from nearby borewells.

This scheme was started with an outlay of Rs.100 crore across the state, with an emphasis on Rayalaseema region. Under this scheme, three designs are offered to the farmers for building a structure/facility in their respective farmlands. This would not only help in improving ground water levels via water harvesting, but also address the shortage, if any, by filling the structure with water from nearest borewells.

Farm ponds brought cheer to farmers in Kurnool. Earlier, the farmers used to depend mainly on rains and take up cultivation accordingly. 

The harvested crops, too, fetched less profit due to scanty rains. Now, the situation has totally changed with the farm ponds. Every farmer, who owns at least one acres of land, has dug a pond in his field with an intention to store water and irrigate crops.

Nagarur village about 120 kms from the district headquarters under Aspari mandal has highest number of farm ponds. Around 148 farm ponds have been dug so far and many more are in the pipeline. 

Out of 148 ponds, 100 farm ponds were dug by using machinery and the remaining under MNREGS. 

All the ponds are brimming with rain water due to recent showers.

The sarpanch of Nagarur village, Kaliki Rama Kistappa, speaking to The Hans India said cultivation is the major resource of livelihood and farmers were benefitted with rain water storage. 

Cotton, tomatoes, green chilies, onions and bengal gram are the some crops that are rain-fed. Besides commercial crops, the farmers are mulling to go for paddy due to abundance of water in the farm ponds, he said.

“I took up fish farming in my two ponds and they are beneficial in multi-purpose cultivation,” said another farmer Thota Rangaiah of the same village.

Another farmer Dadi Kistappa also reaped huge profit from green chilies. His planted green chillies in three acres by investing Rs 1.50 lakh (Rs 50,000 per acre) and got in return Rs 5 lakh on the crop.

Besides money, he also bagged the “Adarsha Rythu” award from District Collector Challa Vijay Mohan.

Summing up the mood, most of the farmers in the village admitted that they made profits because of the farm ponds.


Let's check neighnouring district Anantapur.

The 5-acre agriculture land of a small farmer Bheemanna is teeming with life at Kotanka village in Garladinne mandal. This was the scenario until last year.

The two borewells sunk in his land became defunct as groundwater levels were at its lowest due to years of drought caused by failing monsoon. He lost hope due to erratic monsoon damaging his groundnut crop year after year.

The farm ponds sanctioned under ‘Panta Sanjeevini’ by the District Water Management Agency (DWAMA) did the miracle for him. He took advantage of the Panta Sanjeevini scheme and dug a pond of 10x14 feet with two metres depth as his co-farmers said that he would not lose anything by taking advantage of the government scheme as the entire pond was dug by MGNREGS labour.

The recent rains had filled his pond with water up to the brim and also overflowed in his land. To his utter surprise his defunct bores began to yield water as his ground was re-charged with rainwater. He is now able to plant tomato seedlings in one acre of land and other leafy vegetables in another acre apart from raising groundnut plantation in the rest 3 acres of his land.

Several farmers visited his land and shared his joy at the revival of defunct bores. Bheemanna’s story is not an isolated one in his mandal or in the district. Scores of farmers have encouraging reports on the success of farm ponds and have clear indications of groundwater table increasing.

DWAMA project director A Nagabhushanam told The Hans India that nearly 60,000 farm ponds have so far been dug by farmers employing MGNREGS labour.    

Hundreds of farmers have seen the farm ponds changing the history and geography of their agriculture lands. Scores of dried up bores had been revived and water springing out of them. He says that the farm ponds have recharged their otherwise drylands and revived hopes of a new promise.

The actual onset of monsoon in the next few days would further boost groundwater levels as hundreds of dried up borewells are springing up with water. The farm ponds numbering 27,010 out of 57,000 farm ponds dug in the district registered 0.25 tmc ft of rainwater.

Sankar Reddy, another small farmer from Raptadu, said that the farm pond dug recently in his 3 acre agriculture land has rejuvenated his land and the lone agriculture borewell revived. He is happy that sheep and buffaloes being raised in his land get enough water to quench thirst. The cattle are cooling off by swimming in the pond every day. There’s enough water for sweet orange crop and for his mini-dairy, he said.

District Collector Kona Sasidhar speaking to The Hans India said that out of the 5 lakh farm ponds sanctioned for the entire country, 1 lakh farm ponds were sanctioned for Anantapur district alone. With a promising monsoon this year, farmers would benefit from the farm ponds, he said.

Vijay, another educated farmer of Kotanka village, said he could find a marked difference in his borewell which is yielding good amount of water as a result of digging a farm pond in his 10-acre farm land. The state government is spending Rs 600 crore in Anantapur district alone on the 1 lakh farm ponds. The government is spending Rs 60,000 to Rs 70,000 on each farm pond using MGNREGS job card holders in villages. 


Sources: The Hans India, The Hindu

Saturday, April 2, 2016

When You Buy Any Chinese Product Such As Lenovo or Oppo, Your Money Goes To China Govt!

It's true! As this excellent article by The Economist notes, there is very little distinction between 'private' and 'public' companies in China. The bigger a company, it's more likely to be run by Chinese govt directly or indirectly. Consider these examples:

Cars (Automobile Industry): "BYD, Chery and Geely are still under the state's wing, being thought to receive ample financial help from the provinces where they operate"

Electronics: Of late, Oppo has been making a big splash in India. No prizes for guessing who owns it - China govt, being backed by a state owned company called BBK. Here is the full story on that! One more on the shady dealings at Oppo and its murky relationship with a company called OnePlus. Also, ZTE & Huawei are secret PLA and China govt projects. Chinese Academy of Sciences has a large minority stake in Lenovo.

Ft.com did an in-depth investigation into the ownership structure of Huawei, including going to their HQ in Shenzhen, China. What they found is - ownership data is murky and details of controlling stakes and backgrounds of those people not made public. Official response is - employees own the company! Read more about that Chinese Huawei trick here !

And as per report below, Huawei and ZTE were part of a Chinese Army project called PLA-863. The goal of this project is, would you believe it - world dominance!

To conclude - when you buy any Chinese product, your money goes to China govt! Remember that next time you purchase a phone or laptop.


Read more about ZTE & Huawei below which originally appeared in ET:

-----------------------------------------------
NSC points to Huawei, ZTE's links with Chinese military project PLA-863

NEW DELHI: The National Security Council (NSC) Secretariat, the apex agency looking into the country's political, economic, energy and strategic security concerns, has warned against Chinese gearmakers, especially Huawei and ZTE, and said that India must take steps to overhaul its domestic manufacturing capabilities to 'check, investigate and ultimately replace risks that come with foreign equipment'.

The NSC said that as per Intelligence Bureau reports, Chinese vendors such as Huawei and ZTE were part of a Chinese Army project called PLA-863. "As per this programme, Huawei was mandated to focus on switches and routers, ZTE on mobile and fibre networks, Julong on switchboards and Legend on computers with the objective of dominating world telecom scene and strengthening its electronic warfare capabilities," the National Security Council Secretariat said in an April 15 report that was reviewed by ET.

The agency said that Huawei had been operating in India for more than 12 years, had set up R&D centres and factories here, employed more than 6000 personnel in this country, even as it highlighted that the company still imported key components it supplied to both private and state-owned mobile phone companies here.

"ZTE of China was recently awarded a contract for enterprise solutions by the Power Grid Corporation of India to provide fixed-network transmission services across the country. This network will carry the traffic of both the National Knowledge Network and well as the Rural Broadband Project. Open sources indicate that a Chinese company was the lowest and highest bidder for the same equipment for two Power Grid tenders for different regions, thereby implying that a pricing policy motivated by strategic considerations rather than purely commercial factors," its report added.

The apex security body's observations is set to bring the spotlight back on the embattled Chinese vendors Huawei and ZTE, who had recently offered to the Indian government unrestricted access to the software source codes of all their products as they attempt to ease concerns of posing a security threat. As per the NSC, the demand for telecom equipment in India constituted 6.2% (Rs 76.940 crore) of the global demand ( Rs 1,638,255 crore) in 2012-13, even as it pointed out that failure to initiate domestic manufacturing would force the country to import $150 billion worth of equipment during the next ten years.

"This dependence on equipment imported from abroad raises inherent security concerns," it added. "According to UN data, China exported more than $7 billion worth of telecommunication equipment and $2 billion in computers to India in 2011. This represented 55% of total imports in these two product categories.
 
Indian law enforcement agencies have been expressing concern that widespread use of imported sophisticated equipment, particularly in strategically sensitive sectors like telecom could compromise the country's security. This is mainly due to the potential for embedded malware, rouge software, remote access, denial of source codes, denial of transfer of technology, denial of maintenance know-how and possibly denial of proper and timely service in the event of breakdowns.
Malicious hardware or software implants could be a potent espionage tool for penetrating sensitive and strategic Indian national security sectors which could be exploited in any future conflict with India," the NSC warned in its report.

The agency also pointed out that a recent report by the US Congress Panel that said the two technology majors from China have ties to that country's government and military and must be barred from mergers and acquisitions in the United States.

"In 2011, the US Department of Commerce blocked Huawei from bidding for a contract to construct US National Wireless Network for emergency responders on security concerns. The US Committee for Foreign Investment also blocked the company's attempt to takeover the server company 3Leaf Systems.

Reportedly, due to the US Government's insistence, Symantec dissolved its joint venture Huawei Symantec with a $535 million payout. Recent open sources indicate that Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico dealing with American nuclear arsenals had discovered that is computer systems contained some Chinese made network switches and they thereafter replaced some components due to national security concerns. H3C technologies based in Hangzhou made these devices," the report said. It also said that the Australian government had blocked Huawei from participating in their $ 38 billion National Broadband network.

The NSC has suggested that India adopt a two track approach - building domestic manufacturing capabilities of telecom equipment as well as 'strengthening measures to test and certify equipment that is being integrated into national critical infrastructure networks to mitigate security vulnerabilities'. It has also welcomed the country's new telecom policy (National Telecom Policy - 2102) which states that domestic production of telecommunication equipment should meet up to 80% of the sector's requirements by 2020.

Source:
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-05-15/news/39282046_1_huawei-and-zte-telecom-equipment-nsc